Animal Cell In Hypertonic Solution
Prison cell theory has its origins in seventeenth century microscopy observations, but information technology was well-nigh two hundred years earlier a complete jail cell membrane theory was adult to explicate what separates cells from the exterior world. Past the 19th century it was accepted that some form of semi-permeable bulwark must exist around a prison cell. Studies of the action of anesthetic molecules led to the theory that this barrier might exist made of some sort of fat (lipid), only the structure was withal unknown. A series of pioneering experiments in 1925 indicated that this barrier membrane consisted of 2 molecular layers of lipids—a lipid bilayer. New tools over the next few decades confirmed this theory, only controversy remained regarding the role of proteins in the prison cell membrane. Eventually the fluid mosaic model was equanimous in which proteins "float" in a fluid lipid bilayer "sea". Although simplistic and incomplete, this model is still widely referenced today.
Early on barrier theories [edit]
Since the invention of the microscope in the seventeenth century it has been known that plant and animal tissue is equanimous of cells : the jail cell was discovered past Robert Hooke. The plant cell wall was easily visible even with these early on microscopes simply no similar barrier was visible on animate being cells, though it stood to reason that 1 must exist. By the mid 19th century, this question was beingness actively investigated and Moritz Traube noted that this outer layer must be semipermeable to let transport of ions.[i] Traube had no directly evidence for the limerick of this moving-picture show, though, and incorrectly asserted that information technology was formed by an interfacial reaction of the cell protoplasm with the extracellular fluid.[ii]
The lipid nature of the cell membrane was beginning correctly intuited by Georg Hermann Quincke in 1888, who noted that a cell generally forms a spherical shape in water and, when broken in half, forms ii smaller spheres. The but other known material to exhibit this behavior was oil. He likewise noted that a thin film of oil behaves every bit a semipermeable membrane, precisely every bit predicted.[three] Based on these observations, Quincke asserted that the cell membrane comprised a fluid layer of fat less than 100 nm thick.[four] This theory was farther extended past prove from the study of anesthetics. Hans Horst Meyer and Ernest Overton independently noticed that the chemicals which act equally general anesthetics are too those soluble in both water and oil. They interpreted this as meaning that to pass the cell membrane a molecule must be at least sparingly soluble in oil, their "lipoid theory of narcosis." Based on this evidence and further experiments, they concluded that the prison cell membrane might be made of lecithin (phosphatidylcholine) and cholesterol.[5] One of the early on criticisms of this theory was that it included no mechanism for energy-dependent selective transport.[6] This "flaw" remained unanswered for about half a century until the discovery that specialized molecules called integral membrane proteins can deed equally ion transportation pumps.
Discovery of lipid bilayer structure [edit]
Thus, by the early twentieth century the chemical, but not the structural nature of the cell membrane was known. 2 experiments in 1924 laid the background to fill in this gap. By measuring the capacitance of erythrocyte solutions Fricke adamant that the jail cell membrane was 3.3 nm thick.[7] Although the results of this experiment were accurate, Fricke misinterpreted the data to mean that the cell membrane is a single molecular layer. Because the polar lipid headgroups are fully hydrated, they do not show up in a capacitance measurement meaning that this experiment actually measured the thickness of the hydrocarbon core, non the whole bilayer. Gorter and Grendel approached the trouble from a different perspective, performing a solvent extraction of erythrocyte lipids and spreading the resulting material as a monolayer on a Langmuir-Blodgett trough. When they compared the area of the monolayer to the surface expanse of the cells, they found a ratio of two to one.[viii] Later analyses of this experiment showed several problems including an incorrect monolayer force per unit area, incomplete lipid extraction and a miscalculation of cell surface area.[9] In spite of these issues the fundamental conclusion- that the cell membrane is a lipid bilayer- was correct.
A decade later, Davson and Danielli proposed a modification to this concept. In their model, the lipid bilayer was coated on either side with a layer of globular proteins.[ten] According to their view, this protein coat had no item structure and was simply formed by adsorption from solution. Their theory was likewise wrong in that it ascribed the barrier properties of the membrane to electrostatic repulsion from the poly peptide layer rather than the energetic cost of crossing the hydrophobic core. A more direct investigation of the membrane was fabricated possible through the use of electron microscopy in the belatedly 1950s. After staining with heavy metal labels, Sjöstrand et al. noted two thin nighttime bands separated by a light region,[11] which they incorrectly interpreted as a single molecular layer of poly peptide. A more accurate interpretation was fabricated by J. David Robertson, who determined that the dark electron-dense bands were the headgroups and associated proteins of two apposed lipid monolayers.[12] [13] In this body of work, Robertson put forrard the concept of the "unit membrane." This was the first time the bilayer structure had been universally assigned to all prison cell membranes also as organelle membranes.
Evolution of the membrane theory [edit]
The idea of a semipermeable membrane, a barrier that is permeable to solvent but impermeable to solute molecules was developed at about the same time. The term osmosis originated in 1827 and its importance to physiological phenomena realized, but it was not until 1877 when the botanist Wilhelm Pfeffer proposed the membrane theory of prison cell physiology. In this view, the cell was seen to exist enclosed by a sparse surface, the plasma membrane, and cell water and solutes such as a potassium ion existed in a physical state like that of a dilute solution. In 1889, Hamburger used hemolysis of erythrocytes to determine the permeability of diverse solutes. By measuring the time required for the cells to swell past their elastic limit, the rate at which solutes entered the cells could be estimated by the accompanying change in cell volume. He also found that there was an credible nonsolvent volume of about 50% in scarlet blood cells and subsequently showed that this includes water of hydration in add-on to the poly peptide and other nonsolvent components of the cells. Ernest Overton (a distant cousin of Charles Darwin) get-go proposed the concept of a lipid (oil) plasma membrane in 1899. The major weakness of the lipid membrane was the lack of an explanation of the high permeability to water, then Nathansohn (1904) proposed the mosaic theory. In this view, the membrane is not a pure lipid layer, but a mosaic of areas with lipid and areas with semipermeable gel. Ruhland refined the mosaic theory to include pores to permit additional passage of minor molecules. Since membranes are mostly less permeable to anions, Leonor Michaelis concluded that ions are adsorbed to the walls of the pores, changing the permeability of the pores to ions by electrostatic repulsion. Michaelis demonstrated the membrane potential (1926) and proposed that it was related to the distribution of ions across the membrane.[14] Harvey and James Danielli (1939) proposed a lipid bilayer membrane covered on each side with a layer of protein to account for measurements of surface tension. In 1941 Boyle & Conway showed that the membrane of resting frog muscle was permeable to both Thou+ and Cl-, but apparently not to Na+, and so the idea of electrical charges in the pores was unnecessary since a single critical pore size explained the permeability to K+ , H+, and Cl- as well equally the impermeability to Na+, Ca+, and Mg++.
The emergence of the steady-country membrane pump concept [edit]
With the development of radioactive tracers, it was shown that cells are not impermeable to Na+. This was difficult to explain with the membrane bulwark theory, and so the sodium pump was proposed to continually remove Na+ as it permeates cells. This drove the concept that cells are in a state of dynamic equilibrium, constantly using energy to maintain ion gradients. In 1935, Karl Lohmann discovered ATP and its part equally a source of energy for cells, so the concept of a metabolically-driven sodium pump was proposed. The tremendous success of Hodgkin, Huxley, and Katz in the evolution of the membrane theory of cellular membrane potentials, with differential equations that modeled the phenomena correctly, provided fifty-fifty more support for the membrane pump hypothesis.
The modern view of the plasma membrane is of a fluid lipid bilayer that has poly peptide components embedded within it. The structure of the membrane is now known in great detail, including 3D models of many of the hundreds of different proteins that are jump to the membrane. These major developments in cell physiology placed the membrane theory in a position of dominance.
Fluid mosaic model [edit]
Around the same time the development of the first model membrane, the painted bilayer, allowed direct investigation of the properties of a unproblematic bogus bilayer. Past "painting" a reconstituted lipid solution beyond an discontinuity, Mueller and Rudin were able to determine that the resulting bilayer exhibited lateral fluidity, high electrical resistance and self-healing in response to puncture.[15] This grade of model bilayer soon became known as a "BLM" although from the starting time the meaning of this acronym has been cryptic. As early as 1966, BLM was used to hateful either "black lipid membrane" or "bimolecular lipid membrane".[sixteen] [17]
This same lateral fluidity was starting time demonstrated conclusively on the jail cell surface by Frye and Edidin in 1970. They fused two cells labeled with different membrane-jump fluorescent tags and watched every bit the two dye populations mixed.[18] The results of this experiment were primal in the development of the "fluid mosaic" model of the cell membrane by Singer and Nicolson in 1972.[xix] According to this model, biological membranes are composed largely of blank lipid bilayer with proteins penetrating either half way or all the way through the membrane. These proteins are visualized as freely floating within a completely liquid bilayer. This was not the offset proposal of a heterogeneous membrane structure. Indeed, every bit early equally 1904 Nathansohn proposed a "mosaic" of h2o permeable and impermeable regions.[twenty] But the fluid mosaic model was the beginning to correctly comprise fluidity, membrane channels and multiple modes of poly peptide/bilayer coupling into one theory.
Mod inquiry [edit]
Continued research has revealed some shortcomings and simplifications in the original theory.[21] For example, aqueduct proteins are described equally having a continuous h2o channel through their eye, which is now known to exist generally untrue (an exception being nuclear pore complexes, which have a ix nm open h2o channel).[22] Also, free improvidence on the cell surface is oft limited to areas a few tens of nanometers across. These limits to lateral fluidity are due to cytoskeleton anchors, lipid phase separation and aggregated protein structures. Contemporary studies too indicate that much less of the plasma membrane is "bare" lipid than previously thought and in fact much of the jail cell surface may exist protein-associated. In spite of these limitations, the fluid mosaic model remains a pop and oft referenced general notion for the construction of biological membranes.
Obsolete theories [edit]
The modern mainstream consensus model of cellular membranes is based on the fluid-mosaic model that envisions a lipid bilayer separating the inside from the exterior of cells with associated ion channels, pumps and transporters giving ascent to the permeability processes of cells. Alternative hypotheses were developed in the by that have largely been rejected. One of these opposing concepts adult early within the context of studies on osmosis, permeability, and electrical backdrop of cells was that of Gilbert Ling.[23] The modern idea holds that these properties all belonged to the plasma membrane whereas Ling's view was that the protoplasm was responsible for these properties.
As support for the lipid bilayer membrane theory grew, this alternative concept was developed which denied the importance of the lipid bilayer membrane. Procter & Wilson (1916) demonstrated that gels, which do not have a semipermeable membrane, swelled in dilute solutions. Loeb (1920) also studied gelatin extensively, with and without a membrane, showing that more than of the properties attributed to the plasma membrane could be duplicated in gels without a membrane. In item, he found that an electrical potential difference between the gelatin and the exterior medium could be adult, based on the H+ concentration.
Some criticisms of the membrane theory adult in the 1930s, based on observations such equally the ability of some cells to swell and increase their expanse past a factor of one thousand. A lipid layer cannot stretch to that extent without becoming a patchwork (thereby losing its bulwark properties). Such criticisms stimulated continued studies on protoplasm equally the principal agent determining cell permeability properties. In 1938, Fischer and Suer proposed that water in the protoplasm is non complimentary but in a chemically combined form, and that the protoplasm represents a combination of protein, salt and water. They demonstrated the basic similarity between swelling in living tissues and the swelling of gelatin and fibrin gels. Dimitri Nasonov (1944) viewed proteins as the central components responsible for many properties of the prison cell, including electric backdrop.
By the 1940s, the bulk phase theories were not also developed as the membrane theories and were largely rejected. In 1941, Brooks & Brooks published a monograph The Permeability of Living Cells, which rejects the bulk phase theories.[24]
References [edit]
- ^ Jacques Loeb, The Dynamics of Living Matter. Columbia University Biological Series, ed. H. F. Osborn and E. B. Wilson. Vol. 8. 1906. New York: Columbia Academy Printing.
- ^ "Phytology". Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society. 2 (5): 592. 1879. doi:x.1111/j.1365-2818.1879.tb01675.x.
- ^ Loeb, Jacques (ix December 1904). "The contempo evolution of biological science". Science. 20 (519): 777–86. Bibcode:1904Sci....20..777L. doi:10.1126/science.twenty.519.777. PMID 17730464.
- ^ O Hertwig, 1000 Campbell, and H J Campbell, "The Cell: Outlines of Full general Anatomy and Physiology." 1895. New York: Macmillan and Co.
- ^ Hintzenstern, U.v; Schwarz, W; Goerig, Grand; Petermann, H (Dec 2002). "Development of the "lipoid theory of narcosis" in German-speaking countries in the 19th century: from Bibra/Harless to Meyer/Overton". International Congress Series. 1242: 609–612. doi:10.1016/S0531-5131(02)00799-9.
- ^ B Moore, Secretion and glandular mechanisms, in Recent advances in physiology and biochemistry, L. Hill, Editor. 1908. Edward Arnold: London.
- ^ H Fricke."The electrical capacity of suspensions with special reference to claret." Periodical of General Physiology, (1925) 9. 137-152.
- ^ E Gorter and F Grendel."On bimolecular layers of lipids on the chromocytes of the blood." Journal of Experimental Medicine, (1925) 41. 439-443.
- ^ P L Yeagle, The Membranes of Cells. second Ed. ed. 1993, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
- ^ J F Danielli and H Davson."A contribution to the theory of permeability of sparse films." Periodical of Cellular and Comparative Physiology, (1935) 5. 495-508.
- ^ F S Sjöstrand, E Andersson-Cedergren, and M Grand Dewey."The ultrastructure of the intercalated discs of frog, mouse and guinea sus scrofa cardiac muscle " Journal of Ultrastructure Research, (1958) 1. 271-287.
- ^ J D Robertson."The molecular structure and contact relationships of cell membranes." Progress Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, (1960) 10, 343-418.
- ^ J D Robertson."The ultrastructure of cell membranes and their derivatives." Biochemical Society Symposium, (1959) 16. 3-43.
- ^ Michaelis, L. (1925). "Contribution to the Theory of Permeability of Membranes for Electrolytes". The Journal of General Physiology. viii (2): 33–59. doi:10.1085/jgp.8.ii.33. PMC2140746. PMID 19872189.
- ^ P Mueller, D O Rudin, H I Tien, and W C Wescott."Reconstitution of cell membrane structure in vitro and its transformation into an excitable system." Nature. (1962) 194. 979-980.
- ^ H T Tien, Due south Carbone, and E A Dawidowicz."Formation of "blackness" lipid membranes by oxidation products of cholesterol." Nature. (1966) 212. 718-719.
- ^ H T Tien and A L Diana."Some physical backdrop of bimolecular lipid membranes produced from new lipid solutions." Nature. (1967) 215. 1199-1200.
- ^ Fifty D Frye and M Edidin."The rapid intermixing of prison cell surface antigens after formation of mouse-homo heterokaryons." Journal of Cell Scientific discipline. (1970) vii. 319-335.
- ^ S J Singer and G L Nicolson."The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes." Scientific discipline. (1972) 175. 720-731.
- ^ A B Macallum, The significance of osmotic membranes in heredity, in The Harvey Lectures. 1910. J B Lippincott Company: Philadelphia.
- ^ J D Robertson. "Membrane Structure." The Journal of Cell Biological science. (1981) 91. 189s-204s.
- ^ B Alberts, A Johnson, J Lewis, M Raff, Grand Roberts, and P Walter, Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th Ed. ed. 2002, New York: Garland Science.
- ^ Ling, Gilbert N. (1984). In search of the physical basis of life. New York: Plenum Press. ISBN0306414090.
- ^ South. C. Brooks; Sumner Cushing Brooks; Matilda Moldenhauer Brooks (1941). "The permeability of living cells". Science. Gebrüder Borntraeger. 100 (2585): thirty–1. doi:ten.1126/science.100.2585.30. PMID 17837973.
Farther reading [edit]
- Yard Edidin."Lipids on the frontier: a century of cell-membrane bilayers." Nature Reviews Molecular and Cellular Biological science, (2003) 4, 414–418.
- J D Robertson. "Membrane construction." The Journal of Cell Biological science. (1981) 91. 189s-204s.
Animal Cell In Hypertonic Solution,
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_cell_membrane_theory
Posted by: gonzalezabte1968.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Animal Cell In Hypertonic Solution"
Post a Comment